Πέμπτη, 28 Ιουλίου 2011

"Γιατί οι κοινωνιολόγοι είναι προδότες"

Από Νορβηγία μεριά :

"2.16 Why the discipline of Sociology must be completely removed from
Academia
Marx is considered to be the greatest contributor to the science of sociology primarily due
to his analysis of capitalist societies and the various alleged injustices and economic
failures that they produce, and suggested socialist remedies. The discipline of sociology
appeals to Marxists and bleeding heart liberals who would rather blame others for their
problems than take personal ownership of these problems.
The sociology discipline is described as the revolutionary “tools for change” by Marxist
intellectuals as it contributes to institutionalise cultural Marxism/multiculturalism. Modern
sociology provides an examination of the pivotal theories of Marx, Durkheim, Weber and
Comte, the authors that have decisively shaped the discipline.
Students of sociology are taught how the public apparatus may be used (by deliberately
manipulating statistics, and rejecting all aspects of biology) to portray and propagate a
Marxist world view. Any and all faculties of sociology in the European world (US/Europe)
are therefore in many ways Marxist indoctrination camps where the students learn how
to infiltrate public institutions and covertly contribute to change the character of society
by presenting falsified reports and statistics. Sociology is fundamentally anti capitalist and anti traditionalist (anti-nationalist,
-patriarchal, - Christendom) and as such; anti-European by design. Furthermore, a large
percentage (90%+) of sociologists refuse to acknowledge biology as relevant and instead
proclaim that environment is the cause of all human behaviour.
In order to defeat one of the most devastating academic weapons of the cultural
Marxists/multiculturalists, we must destroy/ban the discipline of sociology completely.
Sociology students are indoctrinated by learning (from a Marxist point of view) what is
wrong in the world. As such, they are transformed into academic Marxist revolutionaries.
So why did the conservative post-WW2 European elites allow the discipline of sociology to
exist and its propagators to operate freely at our universities?
The European elites at the time, underestimated the discipline as it could not directly
affect the “important aspects/sectors” of society (according to their definition); defence
(police/military), law and finance. Needless to say, this was a critical mistake because the
discipline of Marxist sociology would later prove to significantly contribute to shape the
cultural/social structures of our societies which lead to the 68 cultural Marxist revolts in
the European world.
Apologists of sociology have successfully prevented the removal of the discipline using
the following arguments:
Sociology aims to explain what is, not what could be. The students learn about
everything that is wrong in the world (from a Marxist narrative) but NOT “specifically”
how to change it. However, as we all know the students indirectly learn how to change
our societies as they study other aspects of Marxism.
Imagine the following; the sociology students learned about what is wrong in the world
from a Nazi narrative, that the Jew is the root of all evil. Wouldn’t that have lead them to
draw their own conclusions based on the self study of Nazi intellectual works (that the
Jew had to be killed)? Of course it would. Regardless of which ideological narrative is
chosen, the student will be brainwashed in that particular ideological direction.
The Marxist (cultural Marxist) revolutionary disciplines (disciplines of the Frankfurt
school) are not limited to sociology, however; philosophy and journalism are highly
affected by the same level of Marxist indoctrination. Their academic weapons are to
deliberate spread their falsified and corrupted Marxist world view through statistics,
reports and articles with the aim to glorify the Marxist/multiculturalist world view and to
effectively undermine nationalistic/conservative/capitalist thought. These individuals
must not be underestimated as they are usually very influential in society (which is the
reason why 95% of them are categorised as category B traitors).
(Related professions: psychologists and social workers)

Political sociologists
Offices infiltrated by sociologists (or individuals who has a sociology major):
Public administrative positions (usually government and public agencies that administer
human services).
Sectors heavily infiltrated with individuals who have taken a sociology
degree/courses in sociology:Census analyst
Community organizer
Consultant
Criminal justice planner
Demographer
Diversity related professions
Health and Family Planning
Interviewer
Jury Consultant
Labour relations
Law enforcement officer
Market researcher
Mediator
Military
Ministry
Non-profit Organizations (leaders)
NGOs (leaders)
Personnel Management
Planning Departments in various agencies
Politics
Population analyst
Public opinion pollster
Publishing - editing, research and sales
Prisons
Psychiatric social worker
Recreation worker
Researcher
Rural sociologist
School social worker
Social services volunteer coordinator
Social worker
Sociology professor
State and Local Agencies
Substance abuse counsellor
Teaching and counselling - high school, college, university
Training and development
Sociology bachelor’s degree as background for graduate school in:
Journalism
Law
Medicine
Divinity School
Education
Political Science
Economics
Business Administration
Apolitical sociologists
A small minority of sociologists are not considered traitors as they are apolitical.
An alternative instead of a complete removal of the discipline of sociology from
academiaInstead of destroying the discipline of sociology by removing it, an alternative approach
is to completely reform it; replacing the Marxist ideological view with a conservative/antiMarxist by instead using ideological fundaments from the following works/authors;
The Bible
Machiavelli
George Orwell
Thomas Hobbes
John Stuart Mill
John Locke
Adam Smith
Edmund Burke
Ayn Rand
William James"

...

Δευτέρα, 4 Ιουλίου 2011

Εταιρείες De-livery

Εταιρείες παράσιτα. Με αρχικό κεφάλαιο καμμιά 30αριά μηχανάκια, ένα τηλεφωνικό κέντρο και ένα λεύκωμα fast-food, ανοίγεις μια εταιρεία.
Προπαγανδίζεις, μέχρι να αρχίσουν να σκάνε τα τηλέφωνα. Σε παίρνουν και σου λένε : "Καλησπέρα, θέλω την προσφορά από τη Mama's Pizza, ναι, αυτήν με την 50% έκπτωση για παραλαβή απ'το κατάστημα". Τσουπ, πάει ο μετα-ντελιβεράς, παραλαμβάνει και στα φέρνει. Η pizzeria ανεβάζει τις πωλήσεις της, η εταιρεία ντελίβερυ βγάζει ένα κέρδος, πες 15% επί της αρχικής τιμής της πίτσας (χωρίς, όμως, τη χρήση πρώτων υλών εκτός βενζίνης για την πάπια!) κι εσύ γλιτώνεις, πες ένα 20-30% της αρχικής τιμής [εξαρτάται απ'τη σχέση : μέγεθος παραγγελίας - απόσταση(πόσο έκαψε ο άλλος)].
Όλοι λίγο πιο ευτυχισμένοι.